Thursday, July 30, 2009
Views on American Government
Specifically I believe the recent provisions provided in the Patriot Act are an intrusion to our rights and privacy, thus a threat to democracy. I am not comfortable, along with many Americans, that the government is fully able to search my private records without any retributions. However they have not done this to me in the past and because I really do not harm the government in any way, they will not in the future most likely. Overall the intended provisions of this act are to protect democracy despite its flaws.
I think that democracy while being able to voice our opinions has a severe time lag in actually doing so. It is often said that society and its values change faster than government and thus our legislators and executive branch can only respond to problems now that have happened years ago. Debates on abortion, gay marriage, and terrorism while mainly issues more in the past are finally being resolved. It is most likely that the top issues of today will be solved later and probably won't be judged adequately at that.
Yet in other forms of government such as communism or socialism such problems might not even be discussed or addressed period. Even though the fundamental flaws in our democracy make it difficult to judge and voice the concerns of citizens to the upmost possible ability, it still is the best available option to do so.
Monday, July 27, 2009
Coulter's Take on Health Care
From her blog, Ann Coulter posted an article entitled Take Two Advil and Call Me When Your Cancer Is Stage 4 expressing her explicit blunt view on the idea of universal health care.
Ann Coulter is a renown Conservative blogger, so her intended audience most likely are Conservatives looking to learn about the pros and cons of the proposed universal health care system.
Seeing as Coulter is a very popular and strongly-followed blogger, she clearly knows what she's talking about and is quite educated on the issues she writes about in her articles. On the other hand, her opinions may be somewhat biased considering she has made a living off of being an outspoken Conservative and may lose some of her support if she publicizes views that are inconsistent to those held by the Republican party.
In her argument, she takes the approach that health care would be easily affordable if we left it on the free market, instead of being overly cautious and holding hands with the poor. She explains that if we make health care universal, then our insurance will not be suffice enough to cover serious and expensive problems, like chemotherapy, but will instead cover everyone’s minor yet expensive issues.
I must say I strongly agree with Coulter on this issue. As she points out in her article, the free market makes services affordable. For instance, nearly every adult in the United States, rich and poor, own a cell phone. If we hold each citizen accountable for their own personal health, nearly every citizen will work to get the necessary funds. If this accountability is simply thrown on the heads of the tax-payers, those lower-class folks start to lose their will to succeed.
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Don't Be Fooled By Obama's 45 Million
I strongly agree with Cupp. The majority of our country is very contnet with their health care plans, and NOTHING should jeapordize that. While I believe we should come up with some health care planfor the uninsured, I don't think downgrading the rest of the health care system is the answer. We need the best doctors, because our health is too valuable to start compromising with.
Clearly, Cupp's audience are Conservatives, seeing as he writes for Fox News. This also shows that he's most likely a credible author, because Fox News is a very prestigious news outlet.